Urgent and Exclusive Report
Saturday, June 14, 2008
I.Dr Movahedi, in charge of the health bas in Evin prison, in company with Mr. Anhari, in charge of the prison guards in Evin, attended Labafinejad hospital to transfer Mansour Osanloo, the president of the Syndicate of Vahed Company, to Modares hospital, per Commander Hosen Zamani order. As Osanloo has been taking of at the Coronary Care Unit (CCU), the Labafinejad’s heart specialists refused to let him to be transferred, and until the time of report, 12:00 pm(local time), the agents have not been able to transfer him, but their attempts to force them to get the permission is still continuing.
Further more, Osanloo stated that, as he didn’t know doctors in the other hospitals and he wouldn’t be able to trust them easily, and according to the right of patient to select doctor, if he has been forced to be transferred to any other hospitals except Labafinejad he would have got to hunger strike to defend his human and patient’s rights. He mentioned that his death would show the real face of the Security Deputy of Tehran Revolutionary Court to everyone all around the world.
II.During all the time that Osanloo has been in the hospital, one of the armed guards was on his bed with gun even at the CCU and his presence with gun has been caused anxiety and stress for the other patients and personnel at the CCU. Obviously, this is the violation of patients’ morality and human rights at the Critical Care Unit.
Ignoring these basic civil and patient rights by the authorities of the Revolutionary Court is illegal, and indicates an overt attempt above the law to this ill treatment with the president of the Syndicate of the Workers of Vahed Company.
III.The primary order, issued by branch 14 of Revolutionary Court, and any copies has not been submitted to Osanloo and any of his lawyers, Dr. Mowlaiee and Parviz Khorshid.
IV.Osanloo’s attorneys have not been permitted to visit him in the prison for last 7 months. Osanloo has been denied to sign the client- attorney agreement which is required to implement article 18 for representing him in his trial procedure. This action which is against principals 34 and 35 of the Constitution, would violate the right to be defended. The real reason behind this behavior is preventing Osanloo’s case to be appealed at the Supreme Court.
The baseless ness of the order and lack of legal evidence and reasons in the issued verdict are the reasons of depriving of carrying a copy of the order by the accused person.
Iran Human Rights Defending Organization
Tehran, June 14, 2008